RM70mil to address traffic congestion at Kewajipan Interchange

After over 3 years fighting and pushing for the double u-turns on KESAS as a means to overcome congestion, LLM and the Ministry of Works have finally approved it. MPSJ Infra committee meeting minutes will testify to this, and how KESAS dragged their feet giving 1001 excuses why they couldn't do it earlier. However, now this will go a long way towards solving the congestion and bottleneck at the KESAS-Kewajipan interchange.

However, the minister is clearly not properly briefed as you can see below - The whole idea for the double u-turns is to reduce the traffic light phases, and even with the possibility of doing away with the traffic lights altogether, in the bid to create smoother flow of traffic in the intersection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RM70mil to address traffic congestion at Kewajipan Interchange

By LIM CHIA YING
chiaying@thestar.com.my

Shaziman announced this after visiting Persiaran Kewajipan on Thursday to see for himself the bottleneck at the interchange installed with four-phase traffic lights.

Sunway South Quay Sdn Bhd is constructing a RM40mil elevated bridge to be completed by July next year to cater for their own development and helping to ease some of Kewajipan’s traffic volume.

Personal observation: Shaziman (front) walking near the Kesas Highway to assess for himself the congestion that chokes up the Kewajipan Interchange every day especially during peak hours.

Shaziman said he had received many grouses from motorists on the congestion at the interchange, especially during peak hours in the morning and evening.

He said he was told that about 18,000 vehicles used the interchange per hour during peak hours.

Also present to brief on the situation was Malaysian Highway Authority director-general Datuk Ismail Md Salleh.

Ismail said the other proposal being looked into was the construction of two U-turns — an elevated one in Jalan Tujuan and another at the Sunway toll plaza — as well as a slip road at the Tujuan bridge.

He said the the package would cost about RM22mil.

Ismail said the cost for the two U-turns would likely be borne by the Government and Kesas.

He said doing away with the traffic lights at the interchange would not be feasible as there were residential areas nearby to be considered.

Ismail said previously they were also looking into the option of changing the four-phase lights into a three-phase one.

He added that the three-phase traffic light option would need to take into consideration the LRT extension route but the authorities could not wait for the LRT to be built.

The construction of the two U-turns would take about one-and-a-half years to build.

“The two U-turns would be built at the same time but the Government needs to first call for tender for its part of the project first.

“When the U-turns are completed, it should help ease the queue and waiting time at the traffic lights,” said Ismail.

Shaziman said the congestion was attributed to the increase in traffic from the surrounding developments over the years.

More Parking Created in USJ9

Do give your feedback on side lanes being used for legal parking. This will help create the much needed parking capacity in USJ9 commercial district, reducing double parking and congestion.


Issues MPSJ needs SPAD to work on

(SPAD = Suruhanjaya Pengangkutan Awam Darat)

1) Public Transport Masterplan
Traffic situation is very bad not only in Subang Jaya, but in Puchong and Seri Kembangan, practically in the whole of MPSJ. As long as people have to rely on private vehicles, I don't see much room for improvement. There is no choice but to roll out an efficient public transport network.
Having the private sector and market forces lead this has not worked out, only some profitable routes are covered, but most of MPSJ is not covered by public transport as recommended by the NKRA.
There must be a masterplan to remedy this, and
a) does SPAD have plans to produce this masterplan
b) Will MPSJ have to produce the masterplan on its own

2) Enforcement
The current public transport providers currently flout the law regularly. Examples are
a) taxis not using the meter
b) taxis waiting at "hotspots" which are not taxi stands, causing congestion
c) buses not stopping in designated bus stops, and often stopping at traffic junctions, causing congestion
d) buses do not follow schedules
e) buses that are not kept in decent conditions
MPSJ doesn't have the power to act on any of the above offences. We would like to know what SPAD has in mind to tackle these issues. We would like to work together on these matters.

3) Infrastructure
Infrastructures such as bus stop, bus parking area, hubs, etc require local council input and cooperation. We recognize that. But we lack info on where we should build bus stops, etc as the providers previously deal with CVLB and not at all with us. It would be great is we are constantly kept in the loop on routes, etc so we can assist in providing the necessary infrastructure.

4) Public Information
Our bus stops lack public information on bus routes, and timing. If SPAD can provide us this information, we would put it up for the benefit of public, and I believe this will do some good in encouraging public transport usage.
Copyright © 2010 Rajiv for Malaysia All rights reserved.