Rajiv for Malaysia

Please note that at this state, this is our proposed guidelines.

1. Guarded, min 80% of residents (regardless of tenants or owner occupied)
2. Gated, min 85%
3. Perimeter fencing - chain link only
4. Guard house - Cannot build on the road, only road shoulder. Need to apply for TOL as well.
5. Must be run by a registered resident association (RA) with annual AGM
6. Guards - must engage a security company registered with the Home Ministry
7. Must subscribe to public liability insurance
8. Agreement between MPSJ and RA

Steps to apply / Cara memohon

a.Mengemukakan surat makluman kepada ADUN kawasan, Ahli Majlis, Pengerusi JKP dan MPSJ.

b.Mengadakan mesyuarat agung penubuhan persatuan penduduk.

c.Membuat hebahan menyeluruh dengan memasang banner, poster, web sites dan mengedarkan borang pendaftar ahli.

d.Mengedarkan borang persetujuan mengadakan kawalan keselamatan kepada semua kepada semua penduduk/pemilik harta termasuk penyewa.

e.Mengemukakan permohonan pendaftaran persatuan kepada pendaftran pertubuhan.

f.Mengemukakan permohonan TOL kepada Pejabat Tanah Daerah Petaling.

g.Mengemukakan surat makluman kepada pejabat Polis Daerah Subang Jaya.

h.Mengemukakan permohonan permit sementara bangunan (pondok pengawal, pagar dan ‘boom gate’) kepada Jabatan Bangunan, MPSJ.
i.Salinan borang persetujuan oleh penduduk
ii. Salinan sijil pendaftaran persatuan.
iii. Salinan TOL.
iv. Pelan lokasi, pelan struktur pondok pengawal, ‘boom gate’ dan pagar. (Tempoh premit perlu sama dengan tempoh TOL dan insyuran).
v. Salinan sijil insyuran tanggungan awam.

The Selangor state guidelines for gated & guarded (G&G), which is in force as of today (31Jan2010) was developed by Lembaga Perumahan & Hartanah Selangor (LPHS) in 2006 (yerp, under Khir Toyo's time).

Basically (this is for landed property)
85% approval for guarded schemes
100% approval for gated schemes (really, this is pretty impossible)
Any road barriers can only come down between 12pm to 6pm (which doesn't address the fact that most break-ins today happen during office hours of 9pm to 5pm)

This set of guidelines, while there & in place, is really not practical, and nearly all G&G would be rendered illegal and should be torn down.

Hence, there is a need for a new set of guidelines (either by LPHS or local councils) to replace this irrelevant one, well, unless the state decides that G&G is bad, and goes on a rampage and tears them all down.

Before we go into specifics, it needs to be made clear that
1. What was presented during the JKP seminar was MPSJ's proposed guidelines, which has yet to receive endorsement from the state govt. The present guidelines in force is the one issued by the state govt in 2006.
2. All guidelines can be challenged in court, even those produced by the state and federal government and acts passed in parliament overrides guidelines whenever there's a conflict.
3. MPSJ embarked on creating guidelines to regulate G&G. There was a long debate, and MPSJ is not outlawing G&G simply because the police can't ensure security & even the police is endorsing G&G.

In this insecure times, we are taking a position to not stand in the way of neighborhoods taking security into their own hands, but aim to regulate it to minimize inconvenience to others, be it non-paying residents or outsiders.