Showing posts with label Enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Enforcement. Show all posts

MPSJ legailises outdoor dining

This is one of the moves that we have taken as a new government, to update the regulations to suit the real demand from the public.

Outdoor dining is very popular in Malaysia, from the mamaks to kopitiams to even higher end outlets such as Papparich.

With this policy, which was approved by MPSJ some months ago, and endorsed by the State Government recently, we can legalize all the outlets who want to put tables outdoors.

Of course, MPSJ will evaluate suitability before approval.

This will help operators operate legally, and also cut down instances and allegations of corruption by our officers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MPSJ legalises sidewalk dining
Writer: Gan Pei Ling (Selangor Times)
Published: Fri, 23 Dec 2011


SUBANG JAYA: A move to legalise and regulate outdoor dinning at eateries in the municipality is winning is being applauded by restaurant owners.

Subang Jaya Coffeeshop, Bar and Restaurant Association committee member Danny Lim welcomed the decision by the Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ).

“This will benefit around 6,000 to 8,000 eateries in the municipality,” said Lim.

Under the new policy, owners can legally apply to MPSJ to place tables and chairs on five-foot ways outside their restaurants during their operating hours.

Despite being unlawful, dinning along sidewalks is a common practice not only in Subang Jaya but throughout the country.

“Now we can apply for the permit instead of paying summonses every month,” said Lim.

He added that it would also help to reduce corruption, as some restaurant operators would rather bribe enforcement officers than pay the summons that could accumulate to thousands of ringgits a year.

MPSJ councillor Pooi Weng Keong and Subang Jaya assemblyperson Hannah Yeoh announced the new policy at a press conference last Friday.

“Previously, the operators were only allowed to place tables and chairs on five-foot ways from 6pm to midnight. They have to remove them after midnight and during daytimes.

“But after a dialogue with the operators in February 2011, taking into account their feedback, MPSJ decided it is more appropriate to base the permit on their respective operating hours,” said Pooi.

However, he noted that food outlets cannot take up all the space on five-foot ways, and must still leave a walkway for pedestrians. Otherwise, their permit could be revoked.

The new policy will affect eateries in Subang Jaya, Bandar Sunway, Puchong, Seri Serdang and Seri Kembangan.

Pooi said restaurant operators, including those that open round-the-clock, can start applying for the new permit with immediate effect.

“The fee is RM30 per table per month,” said Pooi, adding that operators must secure the new permit by March 2012.

Shock visit for irresponsible resident

Signalling to MPSJ Enforcement that illegal dumpers can be traced and can be caught. We need to start enforcing to produce good behavior.


Shock visit for irresponsible resident

Published: Fri, 21 Oct 2011

SUBANG JAYA: Homeowners who unwittingly left their addresses in piles of trash got a visit from an irate Hannah Yeoh last Saturday.

The Subang Jaya assemblyperson, accompanied by Subang Jaya Municipal councillors Dr Loi Kheng Min and Rajiv Rishyakaran, decided to confront the culprits in an effort to curb the irresponsible behaviour.

The culprits were identified by addresses on letters and receipts found in garbage bags tossed on sidewalks in SS18 and SS19.

The man who greeted them at the first house was confused and then embarrassed when told of the purpose of their visit.

“I didn’t even know about this, it was probably my wife. I am really sorry, I will talk to her,” said the man.

However, the next visit was less successful because the residents refused to answer the door.

Undeterred, they called the house using the phone number on a receipt found a few streets away, but were told that the people responsible for dumping the trash had all recently passed away.

“It seems that a call from us was like a call to heaven,” said Rajiv.

He pointed out that illegal dumping was due to the lack of civic-mindedness by sections of the community and not because of lack of action by MPSJ.

“If you doubt they are doing their job, come to me; I want everyone, especially the residents, to play their part in solving this issue,” he said.

Yeoh said she hoped the culprits realise that their actions affect the whole community.
“Confronting them will make them think twice,” she said.

Illegal Car Park & MPSJ Towing

I admit having your car towed is definitely not a pleasant experience. I had a taste of it once in SS15 Subang Jaya, while having lunch (parked hardly half hour). But I admit, by parking illegally, I did contribute to the congestion in SS15.

Sometimes we have to adjust. Maybe eat somewhere else. Maybe walk a little further. Maybe go at a different time.

At the same time, since I've been in MPSJ, I've been constantly raising issues pertaining to parking, getting MPSJ to improve allocation of bays for the public's convenience. You can read more here:
http://www.rajiv4malaysia.com/search/label/Parking

While a lot of "victims"/offenders are very angry at MPSJ, there are lots of business operators and public that are equally upset with MPSJ for not being strict enough.

Below is a blogpost by someone, and some answers to it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://jsb-expansion.blogspot.com/2010/08/thoughtless-mpsj.html

1. It was towed because it was parked illegally. Too many people are ignoring the summons, its not effective enough as a deterrent.

2. Take it as part of the penalty. MPSJ is just recovering cost.

3. True, there should be improvement in this area. But if you call the police to report, they'll advice you that MPSJ has towed it.

4. The tow truck operators can only tow in the presence and command of a MPSJ enforcement officer.

5. I think you yourself is well aware that you did not park legally

6. Yes, those motorbikes are also parked illegally.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Area : Puchong
Location : Bandar Puteri
Date : 27th July 2010
Fiasco Time : About 1135~1150
Duration : 1135 ~ 1300

Good day.

Last week, for the first time, I lost my car. I had parked my car beside a shop, at a place designated as motorcycle parking as the surrounding area were full and the only legal empty spot was beside a vehicle whose owners were fixing aircons. I was not the only car parked along that stretch.

After settling what I had to do, between 5-10 minutes, 15mins tops, I headed towards where I parked my car. It was just a minute's walk. So imagine my horror when I did not see my car there. I was just stunned.

Stolen! That was the first thought that crossed my mind! For a very long while, I stood around, looking about aimlessly. I even tried to think if I had parked somewhere else. Slowly, I noticed that the cars that were parked alongside my car were all gone, too. The 2 cars that were there then had just parked there.

I made my way to the shop and the manager took the trouble to explain to me that while I was gone, the tow truckers came along. In just about 2-3 minutes they towed away my car as I wasn't there to remove my car, immediately. Incidentally, another towed car passed his shop at that moment.

In my shock, I wasn't sure if I had thanked him or not. He even took the trouble to explain to me where they took my car to. To that manager of the that shop, thank you so much. A simple explanation such of that really managed to bring a little calm to my shocked soul, knowing that my car was not stolen.

My friend came all the way from work to rescue and help me get out of this unnecessary mess. And it wasn't that near to get here, took her about 30 minutes, while I waited for her along the main road, standing between 2 banks which occupies the corners of 2 rows of shophouses, making that short stretch in between hectic with passing cars.

What I want to point out are :

1. Why was my car towed away? I admit that I parked my car at the wrong place, but I think that a summon is suffice. I was not blocking the traffic flow nor the road. While I was waiting for my friend to arrive, I observed that cars that were parking illegally for a longer period than I did were not even looked at! Was it because they were at a busy stretch and towing it away would only cause a little more congestion?

2. Why was I charged the tow fee and the 'simpanan fee'? I did not ask my car to be towed to or 'stored' in the MPSJ premise.

3. Why was there not information at all on what happened to my car? If the shop manager did not inform me of what happened, I would just be standing, not knowing what happened. It is not a towing-zone, or at least I did not see any sign put up along that stretch to indicate such.

4. How can the MPSJ allow the tow-truckers to make the decision on which car to tow? How did they make that decision? Are they MPSJ officers? I guessed, perhaps they were paid on the number of cars they were able to tow. This is because cars that were parked in non-parking bay along the road on the short, busy stretch were not even given a look at. They just zoomed by (like maniacs). Once, I even saw one of them honking at a car in front, when it slowed down and stopped to let the driver reverse his car out from his parking spot. He didn't even bother to wait and just swerved to the opposite lane and sped away. Cars that were double-parked were also let go. My car was at stretch where the traffic is usually clear and smooth. And yet it was towed away.

5. Nothing was said or explain about the nature of my mistake by the attending officer. When I went to recover my car, all the officer did was to give me a form to sign, sort of a like a declaration that I agreed that I was wrong, asked for my IC and told me that I had already been given a discount, when I saw the amount. I didn't argue with her at that moment as I was a little shock and I need my car.

6. I parked in a parking for motorcyles and my car was deemed parked illegally and towed away. What about those motorcyclist who parked their vehicles in parking bays meant for cars? Is that done deemed illegal? Just a thought that crossed my mind.

Taking this opportunity, I would like to thank the manager and especially my friend, for their help.

I just felt that this towing operation was not well carried out. It made me feel that MPSJ just wanted 'fast and easy money' and the unfortunate rakyat became its cash cow. I was the unlucky few who was milked for the ringgits they need to fill up they coffers. The summon only encompassed approximately 30% of the total sum I paid to recover my car. The balance 70% went under the tow and 'simpanan' charges. I don't think that I should be charged the towing and 'simpanan' charges. And not to mention, the emotional stress on the victim. I guess they knew that we need our cars and most of us would pay up to get them back.

Can somebody help me? I want to send this out to the appropriate people, people who has the power to do something about this. I really feel strongly that this operation could be carried out in a better, more thoughtful manner.

Thank you.

Regards,
Cash Cow, Forced

News Clipping: Double-parkers beware, MPSJ promises swift action

Double-parkers beware, MPSJ promises swift action

BY LEVEN WOON ON 1 JUN, 2010 
TAGGED:  •  •  •  • 
IN NEWSSUBANG JAYA.
Vehicles doubleparked in SS15, SS16, and USJ 21 will now have summons locks affixed to their side mirrors.
Speaking to the media after MPSJ’s full board meeting, MPSJ president Adnan Md Ikhsan announced that the measure will be imposed starting today to curb the double parking woes in the areas
“We have bought 1700 locks and (they) could be reused up to 27000 times. (Today) we are going to kickoff in SS15.”
Culprits will have to settle the RM80 summons before paying RM40 to undo the lock at the MPSJ headquarters.
The measure went through preliminary trials in USJ Taipan from January to March. It was claimed the measure resulted in improved traffic conditions in the area.
The local council meanwhile was selected as one of the twelve local councils to receive a RM2.3 million grant under the federal government’s Safe City program.
MPSJ has mapped out five criminal ‘hotspots’ each in Subang Jaya and Puchong. A working committee comprising local councillors, OCPDs and NGOs will facilitate the program.
“Our three main priorities will be to improve the lighting of these hotspots, to install security alarms and to alienate walkways from motorcycle lane.
He said among some identified hotspots include USJ8, Puchong Jaya, Bandar Bukit Puchong, Putra Permai, and Seri Kembangan.
“We have done our studies; we will start as soon as we got the funds,” Adnan said.
The council has also amended the local government act so that it may charge any premise owners of illegal businesses in court.
Adnan said many premise owners are being apathetic even though their premises are rented out to illegal businesses.
“They don’t care whether the tenants are conducting illegal cyber cafes, gambling or whatsoever. They only want their rentals paid on time.
“With the amended act, MPSJ now is entitled to charge those premise owners in court. So they have to make sure they rent (out premises) to the right person.”
MPSJ will also spend RM1.15million to upgrade bus stops in 77 locations. They are now in the process of appointing contractors and reviewing their site plan.
The fund was granted by the federal government under the National Key Result Areas (NKRA) public transport chapter.
The local council also called on the public to avoid any self-claimed MPSJ agent, but instead visit the MPSJ itself.
“We even saw a cyber cafe license being listed for bidding on the Internet, but we would like to remind the public that (the) license is not transferable.”

The Star Online: Brakes on repeat traffic offenders

If this goes thru, at last MPSJ summons would have some bite, and this will help with enforcement and bringing order especially to commercial centers.

This article is from The Star Online (http://thestar.com.my)
URL: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/5/19/central/6286711&sec=central

__________________________________________________________________________

REPEAT traffic and parking offenders beware — if an amendment of the Road Transport Act at the next Parliament session goes through, it will see the linking of local council summonses to road tax renewal.

Now, offenders need only settle summonses that are issued by the traffic police or Road Transport Department (JPJ) for offences like using a handphone while driving, speeding, not stopping at traffic lights or driving with an expired road tax, before they renew their road tax.

A local council issues summonses to offenders who do not pay for their parking, double park, or park at non-designated parking spots.
Gotcha!: Traffic offenders may have to settle their local council summonses before they can renew their road tax if an amendment to the Road Transport Act is passed at the Parliament session in June.
Traffic offenders will be slapped with a RM80 fine in areas under the Subang Jaya Municipal Council's (MPSJ) jurisdiction.

A grace period is given whereby they can appeal for their fines to be lowered if it is paid early.

However, many offenders choose to ignore the local council summonses as it does not affect their road tax renewal.

According to the MPSJ, the council issues an average of 17,000 traffic summonses a month, of which only 17% is settled.

The only way that the council can enforce its traffic and parking rules is to haul offenders to court, but there are limitations in terms of time and resources.

A source said a proposal was brought up during a recent briefing with the JPJ.

"If an amendment to Section 17(1)(d) of the Road Transport Act 1978 (Act 333) is passed at the next Parliament session in June, local councils would be able to link up with the JPJ.

"When that happens, offenders will have to settle their local council summonses before renewing their road tax.

"This link is necessary in urban councils where parking issues are especially rampant," he said.

Among the urban councils the source cited are the Petaling Jaya City Council, Klang Municipal Council, Kajang Municipal Council, Selayang Municipal Council and MPSJ.

There are about 150 local councils in Malaysia.
__________________________________________________________________________
Your one-stop information portal:
The Star Online
http://thestar.com.my
Copyright © 1995-2010 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Star Publications is prohibited.

Have you paid up?

--------------------------- 

Have you paid up?

MPSJ gets tough with assessment tax defaulters

By: by Meena L. Ramadas (May 17, 2010)




MPSJ personnel seize a sofa from a furniture shop in
Taman Puchong Prima
.
THE Subang Jaya Muncipal Council (MPSJ) is cracking the whip on assessment tax defaulters, and residential areas will not be spared.

MPSJ Revenue director Sharifah Rohaida Abd Rahman said assessment tax is overdue on 30% of residential properties in the muni-cipality, which equates to about RM7 million.

"The total assessment tax from residential properties is approximately RM23 million a year," she said after an MPSJ operation to collect the overdue payments.

"We have been focusing so much on acq-uiring overdue fees from commercial prop-erties which have higher assessment tax, to the extent that residential property defaulters have been overlooked."

Sharifah said some home owners have not paid assessment tax for over 10 years.

She said the assessment rate for residential properties is 5% of the value of the property, vacant land: 2% of the value, and commercial properties 6% of the market value or rental income.

Tax is payable twice a year in January and July, and owners are given two months to settle the payments.

Sharifah said the council had issued 250,148 assessment bills amounting to RM74.7 million up to April 30, and collected 90% of taxes.

The MPSJ operation last week was con-ducted on 20 premises, nine of which were commercial properties with a total arrears of RM103,364.

The council seized four items from a fur-niture shop in Taman Puchong Prima whose owner had failed to pay assessment tax for four years, amounting to RM2,538.

Three sofa sets, each worth RM800, and a lounge sofa worth RM200 were seized as a guarantee for payment.

Sharifah said that if the owner did not pay the overdue sum in a week, the council would auction the items.

She said the operation started last month and will end on June 30.

Defaulters will be issued with notices. Sharifah said they would be given 15 days from the date on the notice to pay the outstanding sum, failing which the council will conduct property seizure.

"But we give them an additional seven days on top of the 15 days to pay up out of compas-sion."

Municipal councillor Cheah Sang Soon said the council was serious about collecting overdue assessment tax from residential home owners as people can afford to pay for it.

"People have a lackadaisical attitude as they think the council will not take action if they do not pay up," he said.

Cheah said that under Section 148, Act 171 of the Local Government Act 1976, the local auth-ority has the power to seize assets from a resi-dent or any party found to owe the authority assessment tax.

--- end ---    --- Article Information --- This article was emailed from Sun2Surf. Article's URL: http://www.thesundaily.com/article.cfm?id=46835 

The Star Online: Bus owner still unperturbed after 75 summonses

Sigh, despite creating parking space for heavy vehicles, they still refuse to park there and insist on creating congestion and unease in neighborhoods. The parking lot at TP2 is just less than 5mins away from his house in USJ12
This article is from The Star Online (http://thestar.com.my)
URL: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/2/1/nation/5587284&sec=nation

Scooping after your dog...

A number of residents have raised the issue of dog poop, and why doesn't MPSJ force owners of dogs to scoop after their pets when they do their "business" in public areas.

MPSJ's bylaw on dog licensing already requires this. Please refer to Section 13 (2)
http://ocps.mpsj.gov.my/cms/documentstorage/com.tms.cms.document.Document_25a96383-a020f414-12146260-1ad2ad09/Undang-Undang%20Kecil%20ANJING.pdf

However, as we all know, enforcement is sorely lacking throughout MPSJ, especially in this area. You can read more about it here
http://www.rajiv4malaysia.com/2009/12/enforcement-lack-of-it-in-subang-jaya.html

I do hope, and will be working towards improving this..

Enforcement - the lack of it in Subang Jaya

A number of residents, myself included have been frustrated by the lack of enforcement (both police and local council actually). The problem we have is having only two hundred plus enforcement officers to cover:
  1. Traffic
  2. Hygiene
  3. Places of entertainment
  4. Business license
  5. Illegal/Ah long ads
  6. Building regulation
  7. Littering and illegal dumping of rubbish
  8. Use of public space
  9. Pets - including requiring dog owners to scoop after their dog
  10. etc
A list of MPSJ bylaws can be found on MPSJ's website.

The amount of enforcement officers in comparison to a population of nearly 1mil is certainly not good.

As a comparison, we have about 1/5 of Singapore's population. We also have about 1/3 of their land size. They have about 35,000 strong police force. We don't even come close to 1/5 of that, when combining our Police force in MPSJ areas + MPSJ enforcement.


In reply to the residents,

1. I'm all for increasing enforcement - traffic, gambling, littering, dirty restaurants, etc. I've been very consistent on this in council meetings whenever enforcement is discussed

2. This increase can be done either by
a) increasing our staff
b) outsourcing

3. Increasing govt staff is not easy. We need approval from state govt and JPA. While most of us (me included) always feel that enforcement staff will automatically earn their keep by the amount of summons they issue, this is not really the case. Most summons go unpaid, as people don't fear it. MPSJ is dragging people to court, but as you can imagine, there's only a limited amount of people that we can prosecute per month, and somehow, despite doing this, it has not struck fear.

4. Since implementing the yellow tag for parking offences in Taipan, the payment rate for summons has gone up - 64% the last i heard. This is positive in helping the case of increasing enforcement.

5. As for outsourcing enforcement, a council meeting has recently directed the legal dept to study and present a paper on this matter by February.

6. Why can't we just go ahead? Well, because we are not sure what legal implications there might be, and instead of rushing into things, which may land us in court, cost us lots of legal fees and embarrassment, and may nullify all those summons issued. So, please give it some time.

7. Not all councillors are for increasing enforcement. In fact some are against it. Some prefer "education" (please lah, i think everyone knows they are committing wrong, and are just not afraid of getting caught). Others fear political backlash from strict enforcement.

So, this is not an easy battle. I am however determined to see it through.

Fwd: what has USJ 11/2 become? a dumping ground for rubbish

Its a shame that in this rather educated neighborhood of USJ, there are still resident who resort to this... If you have any information of the culprits, MPSJ would be happy to take action. Else, to clean up, a simple complaint to MPSJ will get a response..




On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM, wrote:

I am a resident of USJ11 for the past 10 years... I came across this dump site at USJ11/2 (infront of Nurul Izzah Tadika)....

It's right next to a main road and all passer-by can see this rubbish strewn all over...

What has become of USJ 11?

Just to share this with you.

Tq.





Issue 002: Enforcement, to ensure fair collection of licensing revenues for council

Issue Type: Problem to Solve

Background:

Ultimate problem:
1. loss of revenue to MPSJ
2. Business not being conducted within MPSJ regulations, often times causing inconvinience to others

- Lots of businesses (30-50%?) do not renew their business licence/signboard licence
- Restaurants who do not licence their outdoor tables
- advertising - billboards, banners, buntings, etc



Issue 001: Enforcement, to maintain a decent level of hygiene

Issue Type: Problem to Solve / Proposal for Improvement

Background:

restaurants/eateries
- Restaurants dirty,
- handle food badly
- no grease trap
- no proper disposal of rubbish
- wash plates, dishes by the drain
- personal hygiene by workers

others
- no proper disposal of rubbish
- littering

Copyright © 2010 Rajiv for Malaysia All rights reserved.