Rajiv for Malaysia

Please note that at this state, this is our proposed guidelines.

1. Guarded, min 80% of residents (regardless of tenants or owner occupied)
2. Gated, min 85%
3. Perimeter fencing - chain link only
4. Guard house - Cannot build on the road, only road shoulder. Need to apply for TOL as well.
5. Must be run by a registered resident association (RA) with annual AGM
6. Guards - must engage a security company registered with the Home Ministry
7. Must subscribe to public liability insurance
8. Agreement between MPSJ and RA

Steps to apply / Cara memohon

a.Mengemukakan surat makluman kepada ADUN kawasan, Ahli Majlis, Pengerusi JKP dan MPSJ.

b.Mengadakan mesyuarat agung penubuhan persatuan penduduk.

c.Membuat hebahan menyeluruh dengan memasang banner, poster, web sites dan mengedarkan borang pendaftar ahli.

d.Mengedarkan borang persetujuan mengadakan kawalan keselamatan kepada semua kepada semua penduduk/pemilik harta termasuk penyewa.

e.Mengemukakan permohonan pendaftaran persatuan kepada pendaftran pertubuhan.

f.Mengemukakan permohonan TOL kepada Pejabat Tanah Daerah Petaling.

g.Mengemukakan surat makluman kepada pejabat Polis Daerah Subang Jaya.

h.Mengemukakan permohonan permit sementara bangunan (pondok pengawal, pagar dan ‘boom gate’) kepada Jabatan Bangunan, MPSJ.
i.Salinan borang persetujuan oleh penduduk
ii. Salinan sijil pendaftaran persatuan.
iii. Salinan TOL.
iv. Pelan lokasi, pelan struktur pondok pengawal, ‘boom gate’ dan pagar. (Tempoh premit perlu sama dengan tempoh TOL dan insyuran).
v. Salinan sijil insyuran tanggungan awam.

The Selangor state guidelines for gated & guarded (G&G), which is in force as of today (31Jan2010) was developed by Lembaga Perumahan & Hartanah Selangor (LPHS) in 2006 (yerp, under Khir Toyo's time).

Basically (this is for landed property)
85% approval for guarded schemes
100% approval for gated schemes (really, this is pretty impossible)
Any road barriers can only come down between 12pm to 6pm (which doesn't address the fact that most break-ins today happen during office hours of 9pm to 5pm)

This set of guidelines, while there & in place, is really not practical, and nearly all G&G would be rendered illegal and should be torn down.

Hence, there is a need for a new set of guidelines (either by LPHS or local councils) to replace this irrelevant one, well, unless the state decides that G&G is bad, and goes on a rampage and tears them all down.

Before we go into specifics, it needs to be made clear that
1. What was presented during the JKP seminar was MPSJ's proposed guidelines, which has yet to receive endorsement from the state govt. The present guidelines in force is the one issued by the state govt in 2006.
2. All guidelines can be challenged in court, even those produced by the state and federal government and acts passed in parliament overrides guidelines whenever there's a conflict.
3. MPSJ embarked on creating guidelines to regulate G&G. There was a long debate, and MPSJ is not outlawing G&G simply because the police can't ensure security & even the police is endorsing G&G.

In this insecure times, we are taking a position to not stand in the way of neighborhoods taking security into their own hands, but aim to regulate it to minimize inconvenience to others, be it non-paying residents or outsiders.

The first seminar will be on the 7th February (this coming Sunday) at MPSJ's auditorium. To register, you can email/sms Mr Looi Kok Kheong
SMS: 012-329 7028
Email: kokklooi@yahoo.com

Limited seats, 1st come, 1st serve

SUBANG JAYA, Nov 13 – To kick off his tenure, MPSJ Zone 3 (USJ2 – USJ15) councilor, Rajiv Rishyakaran and People’s Committee (JKP Zone 3) committee members met up with residents’ representatives.

According to Rajiv, the meeting which was attended by close 100 representatives of resident associations in the zone was organized to provide various resident association leaders an opportunity to meet with the office bearers in MPSJ.

“This is the first time we have held such a dinner get-together,” he said. “We have close to 40 resident associations within the area of Zone 3, including Rukun Tetangga and apartment management councils and we hope that with closer cooperation between the resident associations, we will be able to raise the living standards of our local community.”

There are approximately 100,000 residents in USJ2-USJ15.

Rajiv also took the opportunity to explain the work as a councillor, and how the JKP was set up. “We have set up 3 core focus areas for the JKP, namely, community integration, security and infrastructure maintenance,” he said.

“The role of the JKP is to act as an intermediary between the council and the people,” he added. “We are not seeking to compete with the various resident groups, but instead to work together hand in hand for the benefit of the people.”

Representative from each resident group gave a brief introduction of their association, their main goals, and also a wish list which they presented to the council. Among other suggestions included gated&guarded schemes, improving parks & street lights as well as suggesting that MPSJ start a auxilary police force.

Briefing and discussion with ASP Loi at the USJ8 Balai Polis before launching the VPU.

Since Jan 2010, under the banner of JKP Zone 3, we have started a Volunteer Patrolling Unit (VPU), with the objective to patrol our neighbourhoods, acting as a detterent to crime. We all know the police is understaffed in Subang Jaya/USJ, am I'm very proud to say that group of residents have voluntarily sacrificed a few hours a month (some much more) to get this going.

This effort is supported by both the police and MPSJ. Each shift of patrolling consist of 1 or 2 residents, 1 MPSJ staff and 1 policeman. More details on this to come. But I want to share an email from one of the volunteers to the patrolling group...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear VPU Members,


I happened to read Stephen R. Covey's book on a subject on "Community Policing.

I extracted some of the salient points for your perusal and reading pleasure as below;

- All around the United States and in other places throughout the world, many communities have reduced crime up to 60% through civil society-which is The third alternative.
-The first alternative is for Police to enforce the Law.
-The second alternative is to lower behavior standards and just live with the 'weakening of the moral fiber of society.'
-The third alternative is to use moral authority to embolden the empower citizen (civil society) to take an active part in the prevention of crime and in finding and prosecuting criminals.
- Who provides this kind of leadership?- The Police officer on the beat.
-They are the ones who have to involve and build relationships of trust with families/society to prevent crimes and "blow the whistle."
-The new model sees the Police officers, with both formal and moral authority, as the real leaders.
-A great sociologist Emile Durkheim quoted: "When mores (customary law)are sufficient, laws are unnecessary. When mores are insufficient, laws are unenforceable."
-"The basic mission of Police is to PREVENT crime and disorder. The public are the police and the police are the public, and both share the same responsibility for the community safety." Sir Robert Peel, Founder of Modern Policing.

We are obviously on the right path from above. I sincerely hope that our cooperation with the Police will help to bring about a safer and healthier society for all to live in.

An update from this posting,

I just got the sms that the traffic light retiming works have just been completed. From tomorrow (29Jan) morning, the timing for AM peak will be as IKRAM has set in May 2009. As for PM peak, the light timings have been extended from 4:30pm to 8:30pm.

I'm also arranging for a site visit with IKRAM next week to evaluate the traffic flow during the peak periods.

The meeting with IKRAM @ MPSJ at 3:30pm today:

1. The timings shown on the powerpoints slides that are with me, Hannah, Arvin (and I don't know who else has it) has not been used since May 2009.

2. Upon implementation in May 2009, IKRAM and MPSJ set up camp for one week to monitor the implementation. During that implementation, a number of changes were made to the original proposal approved. (unfortunately, no one bothered to tell the councillors/adun).

3. The timings that IKRAM/MPSJ Engineering finally agreed upon was then documented and sent to MPSJ by IKRAM in a project completion report in July 2009. So, there is the proposed timing and implemented timing, both of which is quite different. Then there is also current timing, which is what is measure/programmed today. Finally there's I think one of the key differences during AM peak is Tujuan turning right into SS19 instead of 20sec its 30sec/50sec.

4. While proposed timing and implemented timing is quite different, implemented timing and current timing is nearly the same. For AM peak, the difference is that after 7:15am the SS19 turn right changes from 50sec to 30sec, whereas for current timing, that happens at 7:30pm.

5. Actions to be taken tonight by contractor (or latest tomorrow)
J10 (SS19) AM peak - to revert to implemented timing
J11 (USJ2) AM peak - alreaidy implemented timing, no changes
J10 PM Peak - already implemented timing. To extend PM peak to 430pm-830pm from current 6pm-8pm
J11 PM Peak - already implemented timing. To extend PM peak to 430pm-830pm from current 5pm-8pm

To be honest, I can't be certain when implemented timing moved current timing, but MPSJ Engineering says it was done during a site visit by IKRAM (Mr Tan, who is no longer working with IKRAM) somewhere in July/Aug last year.

If after this minor changes has been done, the condition is not satisfactory, then it means that the traffic patterns/volume has changed, and we need to go thru a whole new traffic study/implement a new system.

The timings that are running on the ground now are NOT the same as per the presentation by IKRAM in April 2009, which Arvin & I have a copy. Over the last one week, MPSJ Engineering (Boss/Director: Ir Ismail, Engineer: En Taufik) claimed that there was some wiring problem, giving intermitent connections, causing the chaos in timing. I was and still am very spectical of this. However they said it'll be fixed by Tuesday night, 26 Jan, and apparently it was one.

On 27th, I was at SS19 traffic lights at 7am, and then after than at Pers Murni to check the timings. The timings, to my annoyance, was not at all as per IKRAM's documentation.

Engineering and the traffic light contractor stood by the claim that during the one week on site monitoring in May 2009, it was found that IKRAM's suggestion was not working, and they experimented together with IKRAM on site and came up with this new set of timings, which they said was the best. The timings have apparently not been adjusted since May 2009.

So, if no one was lying, by right traffic today and yesterday should be back to normal. But I know its not. I insisted on a meeting with IKRAM that day inself to get to the bottom of this, unfortunately, the person who did this project was in Melaka, so the meeting is today at 3:30pm.

We'll get to the bottom of this mess then.

http://streets.nst.com.my/Current_News/Streets/Wednesday/Stories/20100127002133/Article/index_html

SELCAT has started its public hearing again. Watch the live streaming here. This is a continuation on the use of state allocation by state assemblymen.